Preface - Mass Muslim Immigration

A major issue has been brought to the media’s attention how the current immigration of Muslims, who practice Islam, and who are experiencing difficulties in their assimilation in new environments not similar to their own native customs and practices. We have witnessed a disaccord with the universe as their means to live by their Quran is much different than other religions who base their beliefs on “deeds” rather than “ideologies” making it more concrete in structure and process.

In my opinion, the mass immigration attempts by non-Muslim countries and governments have produced quantities of failures. Failures that identify the distinct differences in the religion, culture and practices of Islam compared to the other religions of the world as well as governmental influences. Europe is currently experiencing a tremendous trauma on the integration of immigrants because they underestimated the influence of the masses.

Modern man cannot possibly assimilate these forces organically. They are unable to experience the exact influences, pressures and stress that emphasizes deeds and actions rather than compliance to the universe around them. The conflict to conform is too deep to ask them to change to the modern ways and leave their Sharia and Quran behind – they will refuse to abandon any part of their heritage and nationality, race, creed or culture.

Although mankind has tried to conform beliefs in the past, they have failed to convert the masses when in fact, Islam is the largest religion on Earth. Ultimately, logic or common sense predicts that if the world wants peace, they will have to conform to Islam to allow the existence of religious faith to rest making the world one religion, one faith and one God, Allah.

Islam did not foster its ideas or deeds in the same amount of time Christianity formed. In fact, one vital fact to accept is the acceptance of historical developing habits of Islam and how it governs daily life with habits that appear to run contrary to most other religions as its formation during the earlier stages of life and the world, appears to have taken a firm hold in the thoughts of those who believe this is the only religion acceptable to worship and accept as the true faith.

I further suspect that there are other elements such as illiteracy, confusion, educational barriers, and other culturally developed “habits” that have no doubt rendered the religion to be misunderstood by “outsiders” and therefore generates conflict and eventually, wars. Thus we are dealing with an illusion of liabilities which is in fact, the true religion and how that religion is to be performed or carried out.

Inspiration is a powerful tool as is the passion to seek the truth for facts or happiness. Owning to the fact there are mass influences of ignorance amongst the modern minds who refuse to learn more about Islam, there are stigmas and stereotypes to overcome the latter-day and the modern-day perceptions of Islam. One can imagine, over the term of hundreds of years, it has fostered more hate and violence than it has peace as Islam, ironically has been commonly been referred to as the religion of peace.

Unless one can receive their own fresh or free inspiration from Islam, there is no human means to convey what the religions feels like or how it shapes and directs the evolution of this religious experience as a convert or original believer. The schools of thoughts have poisoned wells that incite disillusion and mix hatred and vitriol messages amongst those who seek to understand it and vice versa, those who live it and now attacked for their religious beliefs.

This incapacity to receive fresh or clean thoughts of cultural concepts and behaviors impedes assimilation both ways. Complicated by modern thought and experience, the communication is often impaired and misunderstood. One could cite one direct conflict after the other as we discuss “creation and resurrection” and refer to the existence of Jesus Christ to begin the dialogue. Embodied in many verses in the Christianity of beliefs, there is no such existence in the Quran.

It is reasonable when discussed, this provokes a kind of biological unity among people causing a divide and isolation problem. This method of indifference to theology can and has provoked violent reactions and psychological manipulation to make one more powerful or influential than the other. It’s an unhealthy competition that usually results in failures to find religious harmony. Can one imagine trying to convert a Muslim to Christianity when their own laws dictate Islam is a major element of their existence?

Why would they abandon their own existence and take on a new unproven faith and fail as well as risk the ostracized and isolation of their own family members and cultural groups. The price is too high to pay for such a change to another faith and totally disregards their freedoms, safety and security in their lifestyle and behaviors. Human knowledge of religion is unforgiving. It is concrete and set in stone for many.

As a result of such risks and criticism internally or externally, the change cannot be necessitated or performed successfully unless all ties are completely severed. This is not based on materialistic needs but rather, a religious philosophy rooted in traditions of Islam and its ancient and modern developments.

Unfortunately, this criticism is not limited to Islam; there is enough internal politicking within their own religious organizations to cause even more conflict and misunderstandings. It seems, due to biases, bigotry and an obvious level of vitriol, any chance of harmony is quickly dissipating or disappearing. It would be a surprise to find successful assimilation models that reflect mutual harmonies without one group dominating the other.

Nativism is alive and resurgent in many communities that have been designated to be immigration points of arrival. There is a blatant refusal to accept anyone who practices Islam as the fear factor dominates the educational aspect of the topic or natural finality that such a merging is unacceptable or impossible.

Human nature has developed natural enemies of the unknown or untried practices within a community or country. We have learned to criticize before learning.

Our finality in philosophical thinking is impaired by distorted truths or perceptions fostered, manipulated or fabricated by a psyops methodology subvert implanted in our media, our schools and communities to wart-off any attempts to assimilate successfully. This refusal to accept fresh avenues of other views has been blocked and presented with louder but less sound views that those words and views set in those parable and lectures of the good book or Holy Bible.

Hence our duty is to be careful and not feed the devil with his own desire to hate and cause pain in the world. Our duty is carefully to watch the progress of human thought, and to maintain an independent critical attitude towards it so that peace will prevail in the end rather than work so hard to end the world.